In licensing, the brief is meant to unlock creativity. Too often, it shuts it down. If you’re competing for profitable partnerships, trying to de-risk deals, and needing to land the right master licensee before your competition does, a restrictive brief can be the silent deal-breaker.
At Skew, we’ve seen hundreds of briefs over the years — good, bad, and baffling. The difference between a brief that delivers commercial results and one that burns budget often comes down to one thing: are you briefing deliverables or objectives?
If you’re asking for exactly what you think you need, you’ll probably get it. But will it solve the real problem?
Our most successful projects start with clear commercial objectives, not a fixed list of outputs. Those clients say: Here’s the challenge, here’s what success looks like. Show us what you’d do to get there.
When you work this way your agency leaps over delivering the thing you’ve asked for and start solving the problem you actually have. Sometimes that means delivering something you never thought to ask for, and it outperforms your original plan tenfold.
If your goal is to land a £1m deal with a key licensee, ask yourself: would a style guide get you there, or would a targeted set of partner-specific assets do it faster and with more impact? If one image could close that deal, what would it be worth the price of an entire style guide?
Many briefs are the product of one department’s view. Get the right mix of perspectives in the room before a single page is written. The objective will likely look different — and more commercially viable — after that discussion.
You’re hiring a creative partner for their expertise. Let them work to the challenge, not just tick off the deliverables. You might get something you didn’t expect — and it could be the thing that unlocks the deal.
An entertainment brand that you know came to us with a familiar request: “We need a style guide.”
You’ve been here yourself. A tight deadline, fixed budget and big expectations. Instead of firing off a proposal we asked “What’s the actual job to be done here?”.
That’s when it came out. A style guide is great for many partners to coalesce around one look and feel. What was needed here was about one key partnership. Everything hinged on landing this one master licensee. Without them, nothing else would move. Or it would certainly be harder.
We could have made the guide, ticked the box, and sent the invoice. Instead, we reallocated the entire budget to understanding that partner’s needs, building trust, and delivering tailored assets over time. The result? The deal closed, sales followed, and the “style guide” brief was quietly retired.
Be honest. Have you ever been delivered exactly what you were asked for, only to realise it had little impact on the real objective? Or been on the receiving end of a perfectly executed brief that did nothing for your bottom line?
A tight brief can feel safe, but it can also blind you to better answers. The next time you write one, ask: Am I briefing for the outcome I want — or the output I’m used to?
If you want your next brief to unlock, not constrain, here’s a stripped-back version of the framework we use with clients:
If you want your licensing projects to move faster, land better partners, and reduce risk, stop briefing outputs and start briefing outcomes.
The best creative work in licensing doesn’t happen inside a cage. It happens when you give the right team a clear objective, the right context, and the room to deliver the unexpected.