Brand extension looks straightforward on paper. New products, new markets, new customers. But in practice, many licensing programmes stall before they even reach a partner. The biggest blockers often come from inside your own organisation.
Legal teams can be over-protective. Brand managers cling to rigid guidelines. Sales directors set unrealistic targets. Creative functions swing between under-resourced and over-excited. And leadership sometimes treats licensing as a quick revenue fix rather than a long-term growth strategy.
Left unchecked, these pressures create friction that derails partnerships and damages trust. At Skew, we’ve been placed in the devil’s advocate role many times. Here’s what helps to break the deadlock.
Leadership often frames licensing as a fast-track to incremental revenue. The problem is that this narrow lens pushes every other department off balance. Sales teams get squeezed. Brand managers resist. Partners burn out.
Reframing leadership conversations around relevance is more sustainable. Licensing strengthens an IP by reaching new audiences, deepening fan loyalty, keeping the brand culturally present, and diversifying exposure across categories. Revenue follows, but relevance keeps it sustainable.
Legal often gets labelled the blocker, but they’re usually the easiest allies. Their concerns - IP control, brand risk, enforcement complexity - are valid. What slows them down is time. Legal departments are overstretched and licensing ends up low on their list.
Bring them in early with a watertight agreement template, a business plan that budgets for enforcement, and a compliance structure that spreads the load appropriately between partners. Show that licensing has been planned properly, and their objections turn into support.
Pressure from leadership for fast revenue often leaves sales teams chasing quick wins. Unrealistic targets lead to aggressive outreach and strained licensee relationships.
What works is reframing expectations at leadership level. Licensing is a long-term build, not a quarterly numbers game. Partnerships thrive when sales are rewarded for relationship quality as much as revenue. The higher returns come over time, not overnight.
Brand managers have been trained their whole careers to protect. Then licensing comes along and asks them to flex, no wonder they resist.
The best way through isn’t explanation but demonstration. Show don’t tell. Share competitive examples, real-world case studies, and successful executions. Whether it’s a curator, a producer, or a show-runner, proof is far more convincing than persuasion. Once they see it done well elsewhere, they come on board quickly.
Creative isn’t immune from blocking progress either. We’ve seen six-figure, advertising agency (really) produced style guides miss the mark entirely, offering no practical use to licensees. We’ve also seen underfunded creative pushed to chase trends that will be obsolete before product reaches shelves.
Our approach is a 20:60:20 split. Twenty percent pre-made, high-quality designs with broad appeal. Sixty percent stretching but achievable work, setting a high bar without overwhelming licensees. Twenty percent aspirational, inspirational concepts to point the way forward. It’s a mix that keeps creative grounded and licensees inspired.
Licensing rarely fails because of weak partners. More often, it’s your own departments slowing things down. Leaders chasing quick wins. Legal stretched too thin. Sales under pressure. Brand teams on guard. Creative missing the mark.
The fix is straightforward:
At Skew, we’ve built workshops like Haul to bring brand, creative, and commercial teams together at the start. We’ve seen how quickly alignment unlocks momentum. And if you need a bigger push, trade shows in London and Vegas are powerful moments for sceptical teams to see what’s achievable.
If you’re the licensing champion inside your business, remember you’re not alone. These blockers are common.
The question is are your departments helping or holding back your next brand extension?